The article analyzes the study of the problem of Turkestan Jadidism in Turkish historiography based on the IMRAD model. The source basis of the study is dissertations prepared at Turkish universities and the scientific conclusions presented in them. The aim is to reveal how Jadidism was explained in the Turkish scientific environment, which directions were prioritized, and how the role of Turkestan Jadids in education, religion, literature, politics, and socio-economic life was interpreted. The results show that, while Turkestan Jadidism in Turkish historiography was initially interpreted within the framework of the "usuli jadid" schools and the influence of Ismail Gaspirali, in subsequent studies it was evaluated as a complex movement related to Behbudi, Munavvar Qori, Abdurauf Fitrat, Young Bukhara people, the press, national revival, religious reform, and socio-economic development. Each main idea in the article is given with footnotes indicating the page.

Based on the materials of the national press of the early 20th century, the article analyzes the views of the Turkestan Jadids on the Eastern and Western worlds, their culture and politics, as well as the negative aspects of the introduction of European culture.

This article discusses some problems in the study of source studies and the history of Uzbek statehood and law.

This article discusses the cultural level of our people during the Soviet colonial period, the cultural and educational activities carried out in our country and their implementation.

This article focuses on the socio-political and spiritual situation in Turkestan in the beginning of the XXth century, historical conditions, the enlightenment movement, Jadidism, and the spiritual foundations of the freedom struggle against colonialism.